Rivers State lawmakers have described the impeachment proceedings against Deputy Governor Ipalibo Harry Fubara as a mistake, outlining alleged offences that formed the basis of their opposition. The comments emerged amid ongoing debates on the political and legal implications of the impeachment effort.
The lawmakers emphasized that Fubara’s removal would undermine governance continuity and exacerbate political tensions within the state. Sources within the House of Assembly indicated that the allegations cited in the impeachment notice included purported breaches of protocol, mismanagement, and administrative lapses.
A senior lawmaker stated, “The process of attempting to remove Deputy Governor Fubara is flawed. The allegations presented do not justify impeachment and appear politically motivated.” Lawmakers pointed out that such a move could disrupt ongoing projects and stall developmental initiatives already underway in the state.
The debate has intensified discussions on the role of state assemblies in balancing checks and governance responsibilities. Observers note that the situation could affect public perception of the legislature, with potential implications for political stability and citizen trust.
Political analysts argue that while the legislature holds the constitutional authority to initiate impeachment, the process must reflect due diligence and adherence to legal standards. Fubara’s office has yet to officially respond to the proceedings, but aides have suggested that all actions taken will remain within the framework of state law.
The Rivers State House of Assembly continues to monitor developments closely, highlighting the need for transparency and institutional integrity in resolving disputes at the executive level.
