ADC factional chair Nafi’u Bala disowns resignation letter, insisting that a letter circulating purportedly showing his resignation from the position was forged and not authored by him.
Nafi’u Bala’s clarification further deepens the internal leadership dispute within the African Democratic Congress and challenges moves by opposing party members to replace officials.
The African Democratic Congress has been embroiled in a prolonged leadership dispute, with competing factions claiming legitimacy over the party’s leadership structure.
The crisis intensified after internal disagreements over tenure terms and the chairmanship of the party escalated into legal battles and rival claims to positions.
In recent months, a camp aligned with former Senate President David Mark emerged with a National Working Committee that has led to parallel leadership claims between factions.
At the heart of the dispute is the question of whether the previous leadership led by Ralph Nwosu had properly ended its tenure, and whether subsequent appointments violated party rules.
The ADC factional chair Nafi’u Bala disowns resignation letter development is the latest twist in an ongoing internal confrontation that has seen multiple court cases and competing claims to authority within the party.
In a statement made available to journalists, Nafi’u Bala, who leads one faction of the party, categorically rejected a purported letter of resignation that was circulating on social media and party platforms.
He described the document as fraudulent and said that his signature had been forged.
“This report is false, mischievous, and should be disregarded,” Nafi’u Bala said, noting that he remains in office as the duly recognised chair of his faction of the party.
He challenged the authenticity of the circulated letter and stressed that no formal resignation was tendered by him.
The purported resignation letter was widely shared on various social media channels and had raised questions about possible shifts in the party’s internal power dynamics.
However, in his response, Nafi’u Bala stated that the document did not bear his genuine signature and was released without his knowledge or consent.
Party insiders aligned with Bala have confirmed his assertion, saying that internal processes did not authorise any communication related to a resignation.
Instead, they affirmed that Bala remains actively engaged in party leadership and organisational activities.
Competing factions within the party have also issued statements in response to the controversy.
Some members aligned with the opposing camp argued that leadership restructuring was underway, though they did not directly address Bala’s denial of the resignation letter’s authenticity.
The ADC factional chair Nafi’u Bala disowns resignation letter development comes amid broader efforts by rival factions to solidify their respective claims to control party structures.
Multiple court cases have been filed in various jurisdictions, including suits aimed at determining the proper leadership and authority within the African Democratic Congress.
The ADC factional chair Nafi’u Bala disowns resignation letter episode underscores deep-seated internal divisions within the party.
Leadership disputes of this nature can weaken party cohesion, reduce organisational effectiveness, and create uncertainty among members and stakeholders.
For party supporters and political observers, the controversy highlights the challenges faced by smaller political parties in Nigeria’s multi-party system, where internal disputes can divert attention from broader political objectives and electoral readiness.
In a broader context, unresolved factional disagreements can affect the party’s ability to field candidates, mobilise supporters, and maintain its relevance ahead of key election cycles, including the 2027 general elections.
The episode also draws attention to the importance of internal governance mechanisms, transparency, and adherence to constitutional processes within political parties.
